मुख्य›संघ लोक सेवा आयोग प्रारंभिक परीक्षा›प्रश्न पत्र 2: सामान्य अध्ययन II (CSAT)›सिविल सेवा अभिरुचि परीक्षण (CSAT)›बोधगम्यता›Consider the following statements:\nAccording to the author, India's
पठित परिच्छेद
In recent times, India has grown fast not only compared to its own past but also in comparison with other nations. But. there cannot be any room for complacency because it is possible for the Indian economy to develop even faster and also to spread the benefits of this growth more widely than has been done thus far. Before going into details of the kinds of micro-structural changes that we need to conceptualize and then proceed to implement, it is worthwhile elaborating on the idea of inclusive growth that constitutes the defining concept behind this Government's various economic policies and decisions. A nation interested in inclusive growth views the same growth differently depending on whether the gains of the growth are heaped primarily on a small segment or shared widely by the population. The latter is cause for celebration but not the former. In other words, growth must not be treated as an end in itself but as an instrument for spreading prosperity to all. India's own past experience and the experience of other nations suggests that growth is necessary for eradicating poverty but it is not a sufficient condition. In other words, policies growth, need to be complemented with policies to ensure that more and more people join in the growth process and, further, that there are mechanisms in place to redistribute some of the gains to those who are unable to partake in the market process and, hence, get left behind.

Consider the following statements:\nAccording to the author, India's economy has grown but there is no room for complacency as\n1. growth eradicates poverty.\n2. growth has resulted in prosperity for all.

20142Mprelimsupscyear-2014p2csatreading-comprehension
A.1 only
B.2 only
C.Both 1 and 2
D.Neither 1 nor 2सही
व्याख्या एवं हल

सही उत्तर: (D) Neither 1 nor 2

The passage states that growth is necessary but not sufficient for eradicating poverty, contradicting statement 1. It also mentions that benefits haven't been spread widely enough yet, contradicting statement 2. Therefore, neither statement is correct.

In English (Question & Model Answer)

Reading Passage
In recent times, India has grown fast not only compared to its own past but also in comparison with other nations. But. there cannot be any room for complacency because it is possible for the Indian economy to develop even faster and also to spread the benefits of this growth more widely than has been done thus far. Before going into details of the kinds of micro-structural changes that we need to conceptualize and then proceed to implement, it is worthwhile elaborating on the idea of inclusive growth that constitutes the defining concept behind this Government's various economic policies and decisions. A nation interested in inclusive growth views the same growth differently depending on whether the gains of the growth are heaped primarily on a small segment or shared widely by the population. The latter is cause for celebration but not the former. In other words, growth must not be treated as an end in itself but as an instrument for spreading prosperity to all. India's own past experience and the experience of other nations suggests that growth is necessary for eradicating poverty but it is not a sufficient condition. In other words, policies growth, need to be complemented with policies to ensure that more and more people join in the growth process and, further, that there are mechanisms in place to redistribute some of the gains to those who are unable to partake in the market process and, hence, get left behind.

Consider the following statements:\nAccording to the author, India's economy has grown but there is no room for complacency as\n1. growth eradicates poverty.\n2. growth has resulted in prosperity for all.

A.1 only
B.2 only
C.Both 1 and 2
D.Neither 1 nor 2Correct

Correct Option: (D) Neither 1 nor 2

The passage states that growth is necessary but not sufficient for eradicating poverty, contradicting statement 1. It also mentions that benefits haven't been spread widely enough yet, contradicting statement 2. Therefore, neither statement is correct.

इस प्रश्न को संदर्भ में देखें →
निशुल्क एंड्रॉइड ऐप

स्टेट PYQ ऐप पर बेहतर अभ्यास करें

⚡ एरर डायरी · ⏱ मेन्स आंसर पेसर टाइमर · 📴 ऑफलाइन रिवीजन वॉल्ट

डाउनलोड करेंGoogle Play