You live in a multi-storied apartment. There is water seepage in the toilet of your neighbour, which is just below your toilet. The seepage seems to originate from your toilet. A plumber visits to fix your neighbours problem. What will you do?

The correct answer is (B) Will let him in and fix the problem.

• Logical Principle: This is a question based on ethical decision-making and civic responsibility. In a community living environment, mutual cooperation and proactive resolution of shared maintenance issues are considered the standard for maintaining harmonious relations and structural integrity.
• Step-by-step Deduction: The problem of seepage originating from one's own apartment affects the neighbour directly. Ignoring it (Option A) or postponing it (Option C) reflects a lack of civic responsibility. Making the neighbour pay for a problem originating from one's own infrastructure (Option D) is unethical. Allowing the plumber entry (Option B) is the immediate, responsible, and correct action to mitigate structural damage and restore neighbourly peace.
• Verification: Option B represents the most proactive and ethical approach. Options A, C, and D exhibit varying degrees of negligence, selfishness, or evasion of personal responsibility, which are logically inferior in a social management context.