Home›UPSC Prelims›Paper 2: General Studies II (CSAT)›Civil Services Aptitude Test (CSAT)›Comprehension›Consider the following statements:\nAccording to the author, India's
Reading Passage
In recent times, India has grown fast not only compared to its own past but also in comparison with other nations. But. there cannot be any room for complacency because it is possible for the Indian economy to develop even faster and also to spread the benefits of this growth more widely than has been done thus far. Before going into details of the kinds of micro-structural changes that we need to conceptualize and then proceed to implement, it is worthwhile elaborating on the idea of inclusive growth that constitutes the defining concept behind this Government's various economic policies and decisions. A nation interested in inclusive growth views the same growth differently depending on whether the gains of the growth are heaped primarily on a small segment or shared widely by the population. The latter is cause for celebration but not the former. In other words, growth must not be treated as an end in itself but as an instrument for spreading prosperity to all. India's own past experience and the experience of other nations suggests that growth is necessary for eradicating poverty but it is not a sufficient condition. In other words, policies growth, need to be complemented with policies to ensure that more and more people join in the growth process and, further, that there are mechanisms in place to redistribute some of the gains to those who are unable to partake in the market process and, hence, get left behind.

Consider the following statements:\nAccording to the author, India's economy has grown but there is no room for complacency as\n1. growth eradicates poverty.\n2. growth has resulted in prosperity for all.

20142Mprelimsupscyear-2014p2csatreading-comprehension
A.1 only
B.2 only
C.Both 1 and 2
D.Neither 1 nor 2Correct
Explanation & Solution

Correct Option: (D) Neither 1 nor 2

The passage states that growth is necessary but not sufficient for eradicating poverty, contradicting statement 1. It also mentions that benefits haven't been spread widely enough yet, contradicting statement 2. Therefore, neither statement is correct.

हिंदी में प्रश्न एवं आदर्श उत्तर

पठित परिच्छेद
In recent times, India has grown fast not only compared to its own past but also in comparison with other nations. But. there cannot be any room for complacency because it is possible for the Indian economy to develop even faster and also to spread the benefits of this growth more widely than has been done thus far. Before going into details of the kinds of micro-structural changes that we need to conceptualize and then proceed to implement, it is worthwhile elaborating on the idea of inclusive growth that constitutes the defining concept behind this Government's various economic policies and decisions. A nation interested in inclusive growth views the same growth differently depending on whether the gains of the growth are heaped primarily on a small segment or shared widely by the population. The latter is cause for celebration but not the former. In other words, growth must not be treated as an end in itself but as an instrument for spreading prosperity to all. India's own past experience and the experience of other nations suggests that growth is necessary for eradicating poverty but it is not a sufficient condition. In other words, policies growth, need to be complemented with policies to ensure that more and more people join in the growth process and, further, that there are mechanisms in place to redistribute some of the gains to those who are unable to partake in the market process and, hence, get left behind.

Consider the following statements:\nAccording to the author, India's economy has grown but there is no room for complacency as\n1. growth eradicates poverty.\n2. growth has resulted in prosperity for all.

A.1 only
B.2 only
C.Both 1 and 2
D.Neither 1 nor 2सही

सही उत्तर: (D) Neither 1 nor 2

The passage states that growth is necessary but not sufficient for eradicating poverty, contradicting statement 1. It also mentions that benefits haven't been spread widely enough yet, contradicting statement 2. Therefore, neither statement is correct.

See this question in context →
Free Android App

Practice Better on the StatePYQ Mobile App

⚡ Error Diary · ⏱ Timed Mains Answer Pacer · 📴 Offline Revision Vault

Get it onGoogle Play