Home›UPSC Prelims›Paper 2: General Studies II (CSAT)›Civil Services Aptitude Test (CSAT)›Comprehension›Why is the methodology adopted in India to count the 'poor' debatable?

Why is the methodology adopted in India to count the 'poor' debatable?

20223Mprelimsupscyear-2022p2reading-comprehension
A.There is some confusion regarding what should constitute the 'poverty line'.
B.There are wide diversities in the condition of the rural and urban poor.
C.There is no uniform global standard for measuring income poverty.
D.It is based on the proposition of poverty as meagre income or buying capacity.Correct
Explanation & Solution

The correct answer is (D) It is based on the proposition of poverty as meagre income or buying capacity..

Explanation:

According to welfare economics and developmental studies (such as those by Amartya Sen), the methodology adopted to count the 'poor' is debatable primarily because there is fundamental ambiguity and lack of consensus regarding what exact threshold or basket of goods should constitute the 'poverty line'. Different committees and international bodies define caloric intake, minimum consumption expenditure, or purchasing power parity differently, leading to conflicting estimates. While rural-urban disparities and income-focused definitions are sub-issues, the core debate centres on the precise definition and components of the poverty line itself. Thus, option A is the correct answer.

हिंदी में प्रश्न एवं आदर्श उत्तर

भारत में अपनाई गई 'गरीब' की गणना की क्रिया-पद्धति विवादस्पद क्यों है?

A.इसके बारे में थोड़ी उलझन है कि कौन-सी चीजें 'गरीबी रेखा' को बनाती हैं।
B.ग्रामीण और शहरी गरीब की दशा के बीच बहुत अधिक असमानताएँ हैं।
C.आय-निर्धारिता मापने का कोई एकसमान विश्व्यापी मानक नहीं है।
D.यह गरीबी को अपर्याप्त आय या अपर्याप्त क्रेयशक्ति के रूप में प्रस्तुत करने पर आधारित है।सही

सही उत्तर (D) It is based on the proposition of poverty as meagre income or buying capacity. है।

व्याख्या:

According to welfare economics and developmental studies (such as those by Amartya Sen), the methodology adopted to count the 'poor' is debatable primarily because there is fundamental ambiguity and lack of consensus regarding what exact threshold or basket of goods should constitute the 'poverty line'. Different committees and international bodies define caloric intake, minimum consumption expenditure, or purchasing power parity differently, leading to conflicting estimates. While rural-urban disparities and income-focused definitions are sub-issues, the core debate centres on the precise definition and components of the poverty line itself. Thus, option A is the correct answer.

See this question in context →
Free Android App

Practice Better on the StatePYQ Mobile App

⚡ Error Diary · ⏱ Timed Mains Answer Pacer · 📴 Offline Revision Vault

Get it onGoogle Play