Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

The need for Competition Law becomes more evident when foreign direct investment (FDI) is liberalised. The impact of FDI is not always pro-competitive. Very often FDI takes the form of a foreign corporation acquiring a domestic enterprise or establishing a joint venture with one. By making such an acquisition the foreign investor may substantially lessen competition and gain a dominant position in the relevant market, thus charging higher prices. Another scenario is where the affiliates of two separate multinational companies (MNCs) have been established in competition with one another in a particular developing economy, following the liberalisation of FDI. Subsequently, the parent companies overseas merge. With the affiliates no longer remaining independent, competition in the host country may be artificially inflated. Most of these adverse consequences of mergers and acquisitions by MNCs can be avoided if an effective competition law is in place. Also, an economy that has implemented an effective competition law is in a better position to attract FDI than one that has not. This is not just because most MNCs are expected to be accustomed to the operation of such a law in their home countries and know how to deal with such concerns but also that MNCs expect competition authorities to ensure a level playing field between domestic and foreign firms.

With reference to the passage, consider the following statements:
1. It is desirable that the impact of Foreign Direct investment should be pro-competitive.
2. The entry of foreign investors invariably leads to the inflated prices in domestic markets.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Question

Read the following passage and answer the question that follows:

The need for Competition Law becomes more evident when foreign direct investment (FDI) is liberalised. The impact of FDI is not always pro-competitive. Very often FDI takes the form of a foreign corporation acquiring a domestic enterprise or establishing a joint venture with one. By making such an acquisition the foreign investor may substantially lessen competition and gain a dominant position in the relevant market, thus charging higher prices. Another scenario is where the affiliates of two separate multinational companies (MNCs) have been established in competition with one another in a particular developing economy, following the liberalisation of FDI. Subsequently, the parent companies overseas merge. With the affiliates no longer remaining independent, competition in the host country may be artificially inflated. Most of these adverse consequences of mergers and acquisitions by MNCs can be avoided if an effective competition law is in place. Also, an economy that has implemented an effective competition law is in a better position to attract FDI than one that has not. This is not just because most MNCs are expected to be accustomed to the operation of such a law in their home countries and know how to deal with such concerns but also that MNCs expect competition authorities to ensure a level playing field between domestic and foreign firms.

With reference to the passage, consider the following statements:
1. It is desirable that the impact of Foreign Direct investment should be pro-competitive.
2. The entry of foreign investors invariably leads to the inflated prices in domestic markets.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

Correct Option: (A) 1 only Statement 1 is correct as the passage suggests that pro-competitive FDI is desirable. Statement 2 is incorrect as the passage states that the impact of FDI is 'not always' pro-competitive, not that it 'invariably' leads to inflated prices.

हिंदी में प्रश्न एवं आदर्श उत्तर